In others, the errors resulted from false or deeply flawed submissions made to the court by people or organizations seeking to persuade the justices to rule one way or the other. In some cases, the errors were introduced by individual justices apparently doing their own research. In all, ProPublica found seven errors in a modest sampling of Supreme Court opinions written from 2011 through 2015. In another case, Justice Anthony Kennedy falsely claimed that DNA analysis can be used to identify individual suspects in criminal cases with perfect accuracy. Chief Justice John Roberts used erroneous data to make claims about comparable rates of voter registration among blacks and whites in six southern states. Holder, which struck down part of the Voting Rights Act. The review found an error in a landmark ruling, Shelby County v. ![]() They are also supposed to be entirely accurate.īut a ProPublica review of several dozen cases from recent years uncovered a number of false or wholly unsupported factual claims. The decisions of the Supreme Court are rich with argument, history, some flashes of fine writing, and, of course, legal judgments of great import for all Americans. Alito even cited a very specific statistic: 88 percent of all private companies in the country conduct such checks, he wrote. Justice Samuel Alito, who wrote the opinion, made a central point of noting that such background checks had long been commonplace in the private sector. Supreme Court, where, in 2011, the justices unanimously sided with NASA. The scientists, some of the nation’s best and brightest, protested and resisted for years, and finally went to court to argue that the checks violated their privacy rights. As part of efforts to tighten security measures after 9/11, in 2004 NASA started requiring outside workers to submit to the same kind of background checks used for federal employees, including questions about drug use. ![]() Many of the scientists had worked on NASA missions and research for years as outside employees. In 2007, a group of California Institute of Technology scientists working at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory filed suit against the venerated space agency.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |